Anyone is free to post but don't be surprised by long posts and endless tiresome debate if Dan chooses to participate which I have a feeling he won't.
On to the debate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan G Actually no, because if you put your little mouse cursor over the red line and then the green line, there is a 100,000+ difference between the PS3 and 360...100,000 more consoles didn't equal a tie last time I checked. |
Actually that's impossible. I tried to do that because the lines are so close together, it's nearly impossible to tell which system the data is for and also when exactly the date is. You said a difference of 100,000. That's not even possible if you look at how close the line is. Whoever was on top, it was by no more than a few thousand. Ad like I said at that point, the 360 surged. So PS3 will have to match that surge to stay neck and neck with sales matching their respective points in their first year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan G For the record, that's called being a troll...No one likes a troll, and now you know why I don't respect anything that you post on these forums anymore. |
Good. Does that mean I won't have to deal with your long posts anymore?
[Makes troll noise] Errrrrrrr!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan G And when it does, be ready to eat some crow...Also, don't be mad if I hold that against you for all time. |
Ok, will do. Just remember the same applies to you. You gonna eat that crow if and when the PS3 does not sell 10 million by the end of this year?
I can deal with being wrong if it turns out I am. Can you?
And why do you keep ignoring what I've asked you repeatedly to prove those two claims you made?