SFMM's coaster is called Tatsu & SFGadv's is called El Toro!

Also i though PGA was getting a Disc-O-Round or whatever it's called.

Six Fkags is trying to dig themselves out of a huge old by digging it a bit deeper but i think it will all come out great in the ends for SF.

You have to spend money to make money.

__________________

I voted for six flags because its simple:

PParks are about the quality of their parks ex: they are said to be very clean.

SFParks are about quantity ex: they add coasters to favored parks very often but dont care of how to manage them or keep that park clean.

Edit:I am basing what I have said off of SFGadv. They get a new coaster every so often but havent maintained rolling thunder.

if you evaluate the extreme best (like 3 parks from SF) compared to the best of Paramount, its simply unfair... SF is a much larger chain with a much larger budget. You must look to the chain as a whole to evaluate. As a whole, that decision is easy, Paramount PArks has well maintained, evenly balanced, money making parks, that seem to receive a coaster every two or so years, and a new installment of some sort EVERY year. The parks are clean, employees friendly, and coasters maintained pretty well. Six Flags as a whole presents many dirty parks with problems, old badly maintained rides, and a very uneven distribution of new rides. You can't compare a park like SFGAdv or SFMM to PKI, b/c each those two park's budgets exceed the entire Paramount chain by a lot. You look to the chains as a whole to see who ownz. and i think every person here would agree, that on a whole, Paramount Parks are better then Six Flags....

__________________
Stanley Cup. CHAMPS.. CAROLINA HURRICANES
========================================
Montreal, New Jersey, Buffalo, and Edmonton went home EMPTY HANDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Six flags for rides

Paramount for atmosphere and park management.

Make this poll more specific and I'll vote.

__________________