Which did you think was the best of the Jurassic Park movies?

I thought the 2nd one was the best of them.

The original was best. It had the best plot with the most suspense. The second one was god awful, IMO. As for the third one, the series is just getting tiring with the same old stuff, but it is better than the second.

__________________
"BECAUSE someone like you cared a whole afwul lot, this park is alive where before it was not." -The Street of the Lifted Lorax, IOA

I also liked 1 the best. It had the best plot.

__________________
**PKI**
Possible Parks this summer: PKI, SFKK, CP, DP, HP, GL

The 1st was the best. It had a good story and the effects were jaw-dropping(kinda like the 1st Star Wars). Star Wars, Jurassic Park and T2 raised the bar in moviemaking in their own way.

__________________
Sell crazy someplace else, We're all stocked up here.

I liked the original. The other two were just completely unrealistic (yes the first one is too, but the others are even worse) and they weren't any good IMO.

__________________
"Cedar Point has a wide variety of wooden coasters" - Discovery Channel

The first one, without question. The first one is was imaginative, fun, had a good plot, and was the one that had audiences in awe back in 1993. The other two were just pointless sequels, IMO. I'm not sure, but I think a fourth one is in the works.

__________________

I'v only seen the 1st and the 3rd and the 1st was a TON BETTER.
Everything about it was better.... Can't wait for Star Wars Episode 2!

__________________
Ne- RCT to the Max- http://www.nedesigns.com
"What's so Civil about war anyway?"- Guns N' Roses

The first one was the best. They got succesively worse after that.

__________________
Aaron Cedoras: Thrillnetwork Story Editor
"Dead men tell no tales..."

the second one is deffinatly the worst. from the first and third, i like the third one better. its more action packed and i like that new dinosaur.

__________________
I was once TN's top poster!
2007 Gadv Count: Kingda Ka-6, El Toro-6, Nitro-4, Medusa-2, S:UF-2, R:TC-1, B:TC-, GASM-0, Skull Mt-0, B:TR-0, RMT-0, RT-0

i liked the first the best, then the thrid. The second one just sucked. THe ending was so stupid.

Also, i suggest that if u liked the movies you read the books, they are 10x better. Also JP3 the book: comming soon.

__________________
Its murda...

Well, the first was best for overall plot and fear factor, the second was more or less idiotic but had some fairly good character development (the psycho that was hunting the Rex) and a bit better comedy, and the third had the best dinosaur development showing the societal organization of the raptors, though the big spiny dinosaur was just an idiot. Overall, I'd rate the first the best, then the third, then the second.

I agree with Natelox, the books are far better, but in my opinion that only applies to the original Jurassic Park -- the second book was obviously whipped off as a sequel to build on success, and it didn't do a good job at all. There was barely no plot development and the whole story was very shallow.

Natelox -- is there really a JPIII book on the way?

__________________
Walk Beyond...

JP I was a classic it will go down as one of the better sci-fi movies ever. It was thrilling, scary, and entertaining. The second was just horrible I couldn't believe how bad it was. The III was an entertaining popcorn flick and I really enjoyed it. If I had to rank them it would go:

1. JP
2. JP:III
3. JP:II

__________________
Sup you coaster gangstas, old school x-cellent is here to shank yo ugly asses.

JP1 is and will forever be the best movie of the three.

__________________

it goes in order

the 1st was amazing, definetly the best
the 2nd was ok, nothing great
3 was a disaster, what's next, Dr. Grant forgot his wallet on the island and has to go back to get it because it has all that sentimental value and all...

__________________
phantompenguin

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by phantompenguin [/i]
[B]3 was a disaster, what's next, Dr. Grant forgot his wallet on the island and has to go back to get it because it has all that sentimental value and all... [/B][/QUOTE]

LOL!! I wouldn't be suprised.... Spielburg's losing it... Jurassic Park IV is basically confirmed: [url]http://www.canoe.ca/JamMovies/apr19_jurassic-can.html[/url]

__________________

Maybe because he doesn't have a Capital One card -- could get one through our popup ads... (In case you're wondering, this is a very lame joke about the "secured" cards that you can lose but don't have to worry about anyone else charging...)

__________________
Walk Beyond...

i liked 1 and 3 but i liked 1 more 3 had some cool parts in it but 1 was the thing that started it all

the first one

I like the 2nd one the most, I forget what happened in the first one because I haven't seen it in so long, but we just started watching it today in Science, and the 3rd one was pretty good too.

__________________
"Nature gives you the face you have at twenty; it is up to you to merit the face you have at fifty." - Coco Chanel

I like the original. It had so much promise for the sequals, and it was the most suspensful and had the best plot. The second one was the worst of the three IMO, and I thought the third one was ok, but not as good as the first.

the first by FAR.

the second was worse but not that much worse.

and the third imo was absolutely terrible.

I like the 1st one the best, the other 2 couldn't compare to the original and the plot in the first one was much better, and the 3rd one where the marines come at the last second was real dum

__________________
13 Bravo Company Field Artillery Unit. An Army of One.

Well, The first JP is the best for me. I never saw it in theaters but when I first saw it, it was great. JP:III is next because JP:II went on about half an hour longer then it should have.

__________________

1 was the best. Like most sequels of other movies JP 2 & 3 were a lot worser than the original.

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Melissa [/i]
[B]is there really a JPIII book on the way? [/B][/QUOTE]

thats what i've heard. Although keep in mind it take a long time to write a book, so don't expect it too soon. I'm guessing probably 2003.

__________________
Its murda...

The original was the best bar none. The second was ok, and the third was really crappy.

__________________
Millennium Force Crew '05
Magnum Crew '06

Proud member of the Notre Dame Class of 2008

I'll say the first one because it was so original when it came out and it was the first movie to have really realistic things done by CGI. I believe ILM did the CGI work.

__________________

Let's Go! HOKIES!

THe first one was the best because no one had seen anything like it before and it blew everyone away.

1st one because it was the one that introduced the idea of there being a park that could contain Dinosaurs. In the second and third one, the idea had already been done and the only new thing was the plot. The first one just gave the best effect in introducing Jurassic Park as a fanatsy idea.

1 for sure