Go Back   ThrillNetwork Boards > ThrillNetwork Support > ThrillNetwork Archive > Roller Coasters
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:01 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 382
Coaster Idea!!! Really Really Cool!

Ok, we all know thatb awesome airtime on a coaster is one of the best qualities we can look for on a coaster? Well, what if we enhance the air into even BETTER stuff?

Heres my idea: Trains would B&M Hyper- style, and their coasters are known for good air. Trains would be the same except for ONe thing: Theres a steel pole under the seats.

Sensors near the top of a hill would tell rubber wheels and magnetic+rubber + Metal brakes each to do somethin. Your gettin air, when all mof a sudden the chair rises UP,m giving that "Gonna fall off feeling."

The rubber wheels would turn up, and then the brakes would kick in. We dont want ANY accidents. Then, really Quick, they would take it down, giving then sensation that you made the chair do that.

And at the bottom of the pole, there would be a Steel Cylander about a foot in diamater, just incase.

STATS:

Coaster: B&M Hyper extender.
Hight: 210 ft.
Hills: Approxamatly 8 for air.
Loops: None.
Special train elements: Extender chairs for "Gonna fall out" feeling.
Special track elements: (This is really cool.) "Out-Side Turns:"

Instead of inside banked turns, turns would be on the OUTSIDE, once again using those chairs. They would fly to the outside, giving a MAJOR gonna fly out feeling. There would be as many of these as needed, but estimated 4-6.

iSN'T THIS AWESOME????? Of course, there's a very small chance this ill be built, but mabye it can replase Viper at SFOG. Who knows?

Post comments and stuff here.
  #2  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:23 AM
Corkscrew Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Jersey
Age: 24
Posts: 575
So, whoa wait, maybe i read it wrong, but there would be brakes at the top of the hills? That defeats the enitre purpose. PLus the turn thingy, wouldnt pull major G's? its an interesting idea, though.
__________________
Dave Matthews Band:
6/24/01, 7/16/02, 7/17/02, 7/18/02, 7/20/04, 7/21/04
  #3  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:33 AM
Ultra Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Olney, MD
Age: 22
Posts: 2,536
I agree with you trock476. Outside turns would pull too much positive and lateral G's. At first, I didn't get the "pole" thingies under the chairs. I think what CoasterDude2001RB means are hydraulic pumps that are able to lift the chair to enhance the feeling of falling out. The idea sounds really awesome and all, but why waste money on giving a better airtime effect when designers can elaborate and find more ways to get airtime without using the hydraulic pumps? It's just a thought. Anyway, the coaster idea seems great. Even though it may not really be in the works soon, the dude can dream right?
  #4  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:34 AM
intamin101's Avatar
Mullet!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Wisconsin Posts:347284
Age: 23
Posts: 3,253
The inside turns on raging bull go moderately slow/smooth, if you had it go slower, they you've got your turn w/o the gs. By the way, I'm not slashing Raging bull in any way, I love the ride, just saying that the turns are kinda a slow smooth swooping motion.
  #5  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:46 AM
edh101985's Avatar
Strata Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Age: 24
Posts: 4,364
It would be cool if the seats spin 360 degrease. It would be cool spinning down a 250 foot drop.
  #6  
Old 09-08-2001, 12:21 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 382
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Honan Beetch [/i]
[B]I agree with you trock476. Outside turns would pull too much positive and lateral G's. At first, I didn't get the "pole" thingies under the chairs. I think what CoasterDude2001RB means are hydraulic pumps that are able to lift the chair to enhance the feeling of falling out. The idea sounds really awesome and all, but why waste money on giving a better airtime effect when designers can elaborate and find more ways to get airtime without using the hydraulic pumps? It's just a thought. Anyway, the coaster idea seems great. Even though it may not really be in the works soon, the dude can dream right? [/B][/QUOTE]

Thats what I was saying. Besides, the brakes wouldn't be on the track, they would be on the pole to keep the pole from accually flying out of the train. And the cylander is alson to keep the pole from flying out. Here look at this:

|
|___ This is the chair
||
0||0 Wheels
|-||-| Brakes
| || | Magnetic Brakes
~||~ Rubber Brakes
_||_ Botom of chair
|___| Pole thing
-||-
|__| Hydraulic Pump

Of course, this isn't on scale, but it illustrates it pretty well.
  #7  
Old 09-08-2001, 10:32 PM
slipknot8527's Avatar
Yeah, shes awesome...JUST DEAL
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: O-Town Down
Age: 25
Posts: 7,555
Well...its a good idea...but I dont think its feasible. Do you know how hard it would be to syncronize the rising of the seats with cresting the hill? Plus, normal restraints break a lot...think about these things! And the outside turns just would not work PERIOD. Way too many G's.
__________________
HANNAH MONTANA!!!!!!!!!
TAKING THE WORLD BY STORM!!!!!
"I'm living proof....THAT GIRLS CAN ROCK!!!!!!"
  #8  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:00 PM
Raptor's Avatar
for a good time visit floor 13
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 24
Posts: 5,148
Having the seat pushed up would interfere with the lap bar and push you down INTO the seat rather than providing more airtime. Neat idea, but it wouldnt work.
__________________
~ RAPTOR
  #9  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:08 PM
Goliathlete's Avatar
Corkscrew Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Aptos, CA
Age: 22
Posts: 441
That's a pretty awesome idea! Call me when it happens!
__________________
Put your hands up!
  #10  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:23 PM
Kyle L's Avatar
Sharks Territory
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 22
Posts: 7,540
This sounds sick, It would be like bouncing on stand up trains, but wouldnt it slam agianst the bottom when u pull a ton of g's?
__________________
Thornton to Heatley all day, every day.
  #11  
Old 09-08-2001, 11:54 PM
Suspended Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Maplewood, NJ
Age: 26
Posts: 600
I still don't get it.
  #12  
Old 09-09-2001, 01:45 AM
Suspended Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Naperville, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 761
Dude, that seriously sounds crazy, that'd be great though.
  #13  
Old 09-09-2001, 01:54 AM
Richard Wilson's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,648
If you want fabricated feelings on a ride, go and hop into a simulator, because the idea of coasters is to provide real feelings of G's and speed
  #14  
Old 09-09-2001, 08:50 AM
Minetrain Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Weston, Ct
Posts: 76
The only problem with this is that it would reduce airtime! I think Raptor is the only that noticed this, but if you float above your seat and then the seat rises, it'll just meet your butt sooner, therefore reducing airtime. Now, if the seats lowered while you were floating...
  #15  
Old 09-09-2001, 04:33 PM
Strata Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 23
Posts: 3,642
natural air is great.
__________________
Its murda...
  #16  
Old 09-09-2001, 05:30 PM
Wooden Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 28
Posts: 220
A very well designed coaster would be much better in my opinion. I look at it from the mechanical engineer's perspective. I look more and more at coasters from the ME perspective as my education progresses, and more at what is feasable, not just what would be cool. Hydraulics cost money. They are more parts on a coaster. More parts means more possibilities of a breakdown. More breakdowns mean more angry coaster fans. Not only that, but as zsteinert said, it would not increase airtime. Putting them on straight springs would make a bouncy sensation, which would be kinda neat, but more of a gimmick. Moving the seats down while floating would most likely take a computer system to control, or possibly a third rail (a la X). Interesting idea, but needs work. That's just my opinion though.
__________________
"It's not that easy being green"
-Kermit the Frog

Last edited by mforce45; 09-10-2001 at 12:42 AM.
  #17  
Old 09-10-2001, 02:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 38
Posts: 1,434
The idea gets points for creativity but if you want to increase airtime, work on restraints that give you more freedom without allowing you to fall out.
  #18  
Old 09-22-2001, 12:29 AM
Teh Band
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melrose, MA (Near Boston) 1006 Miles from Augusta, GA
Age: 24
Posts: 11,177
Blog Entries: 4
if it is bulit i would ride it just to say i did it no madder what eney one said
  #19  
Old 09-22-2001, 01:01 PM
Lancelot's Avatar
M who?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas City
Age: 23
Posts: 1,666
The trains themselves would cost like 10 mil. The outside turns sound fun, but probably will end up snapping someone's neck b/c of the g's.
__________________
Ruler of TN's Darkside
Hell is truth seen to late
R.I.P.-Orient Express
  #20  
Old 09-22-2001, 03:23 PM
Minetrain Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Franklin, TN
Age: 25
Posts: 84
bigbadwolf17
Minetrain Poster


Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Franklin, Tn
Posts: 35
New coaster type idea
I just had an idea for a new type of coaster that i think would be really cool. I dont know what you would call it but the idea is that when the train gets airtime the riders seat is lifted up. Its kinda like an extender sword ( like the plastic light sabers) and when negative G's are pulled the seats raise up to a certain point. The idea of raising above the coaster train would just be pretty scary And there could be certain switches on the track that lock and unlock so this manuever is possible. And seeing people on it would be funny cause its kinda like "the wave" at a football game This would also maximize the drop feeling that is acheived. Does anybody understand what im saying or do i just sound like a retard?


__________________
"I saw Mrs. Kobople and Principal Skinner in the closet making babies............and i saw one of the babies......and it looked at me. -Ralph from the Simpsons


Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
  #21  
Old 09-22-2001, 03:26 PM
Minetrain Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Franklin, TN
Age: 25
Posts: 84
Look at the date sounds familiar huh?:rolleyes: Isnt it a little weird that we had the EXACT same idea:rolleyes: The only thing is i thought of it first!:p tO BAD U UNORIGINAL S@#$! :D
  #22  
Old 09-22-2001, 03:33 PM
Mega Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Jersey
Age: 24
Posts: 2,268
Am i the only one who has no clue as to what he is talking about?

I get the outside turn idea which suks it will never happen.. Why does everyone keep bringing up the ideas of loops inside out and the opposite banked turns.. its way too intense, that's why none exist .
__________________
http://www.brettstevens.5u.com/
  #23  
Old 09-22-2001, 03:54 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 1,125
If there was outside banking, then the g forces would be too much, and you'd be pushed outward. It would give you that "I'm going to fall out feeling," but it would also be very uncomfortable and dangerous.
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.

© 2001-2010 ThrillNetwork, LLC. All rights reserved.
About Us - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Contact Us
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4 - Copyright © 2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2