Go Back   ThrillNetwork Boards > ThrillNetwork Support > ThrillNetwork Archive > Roller Coasters
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2001, 02:20 PM
coasterz44's Avatar
mysql_fetch_array($title) ;
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 20
Posts: 962
A Model Of The Stratosphere Ride!!!

Here Is A Pic Of The Ride:
<img Src="http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Sep-07-Fri-2001/photos/news.jpg">
Here Is One Of The Car People Would Ride In:
<img Src="http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Sep-07-Fri-2001/photos/strat.jpg">
It's In The Upper Left Corner, Behind The Guy.
I Wish They Hadn't Rejected It, It Would've Been Cool!
  #2  
Old 09-15-2001, 02:32 PM
SFGadvKing's Avatar
Better Than Any Roller Coaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: West Orange, NJ
Age: 22
Posts: 5,618
i dont get how it would get back up, would it go backwards all the way up 750 ft.?
__________________
I was once TN's top poster!
2007 Gadv Count: Kingda Ka-6, El Toro-6, Nitro-4, Medusa-2, S:UF-2, R:TC-1, B:TC-, GASM-0, Skull Mt-0, B:TR-0, RMT-0, RT-0
  #3  
Old 09-15-2001, 02:34 PM
LoCoSuMo's Avatar
Hyped for Hades
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 23
Posts: 1,685
That looks awesome, it's a shame they won't allow it....
__________________
The Gravity Group: Turning "Gee what if..." into "G why not?"
  #4  
Old 09-15-2001, 02:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bay Area, California
Age: 23
Posts: 565
Yeah, I am really pissed cuz that would be awesome and would probably be considered a Nevada landmark!
  #5  
Old 09-15-2001, 03:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kansas City!
Posts: 320
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by SFGadvKing [/i]
[B]i dont get how it would get back up, would it go backwards all the way up 750 ft.? [/B][/QUOTE]

They probably use a chainlift of some sort. Maybe sorta something similar to the Boomerang caosters. I don't know for sure.
  #6  
Old 09-15-2001, 03:33 PM
Raptor's Avatar
for a good time visit floor 13
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 24
Posts: 5,148
I don't understand, would the car just coast back and forth until it came to a stop? I'm glad they won't build that, its a huge eyesore.
__________________
~ RAPTOR
  #7  
Old 09-15-2001, 03:38 PM
Kyle L's Avatar
Sharks Territory
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 22
Posts: 7,540
That sucks.......! But it doesn't look that great, it's all numbers! But 750 feet is totally awesome!!!!!!!!!!!! I wich they built it!
__________________
Thornton to Heatley all day, every day.
  #8  
Old 09-15-2001, 04:22 PM
Giga Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Age: 25
Posts: 1,762
im sort of lost, they already rejected the ride?

who did nevada council? So this thing is not going to be built at all?

also how he heck does this monstrosity work?
__________________
thrillride, i hardly knew ye....
  #9  
Old 09-15-2001, 04:37 PM
Erik Johnson's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New London, CT
Posts: 2,983
I don't think they've rejected it completely. As I understand it, there will be another meeting in a few weeks when a final decision will be made. Don't give up hope yet!
__________________
Erik Johnson
ThrillNetwork Co-Administrator
Upload an image to the DB! Post a track or comment in SpeedZone! They count towards your post count!
  #10  
Old 09-15-2001, 04:57 PM
Inverted Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Jersey
Age: 22
Posts: 854
I heard the same thing Erik heard. I hope it is built so I can ride it!!
__________________
RabidCoaster - It's only a ride
<BR>http://geocities.com/rabidcoaster
  #11  
Old 09-15-2001, 05:19 PM
Strata Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 23
Posts: 3,642
now that is one ugly looking coaster. I not suprised the people rejected the idea. There is that fish hook thing that we all heard about a long time ago (notice the shape of the track).
__________________
Its murda...
  #12  
Old 09-15-2001, 05:38 PM
Wooden Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Palmcoast,FL
Posts: 172
The people WERE supposed to get on half way up the verticals pike and a chain would take them the rest of the way up.
  #13  
Old 09-15-2001, 05:45 PM
Wooden Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Glasgow, UK
Age: 26
Posts: 183
That looks rubbish, I thought it would have been a complete circuit coaster, i mean all its got going for it is the height but the fact your enclosed would mean u wouldnt even get the wond rushing through your sails.
__________________
LINK REMOVED BY BOARD ADMIN
  #14  
Old 09-15-2001, 05:52 PM
Looping Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Age: 24
Posts: 352
yea that car sucks, that takes away like 65% of the ride, it wouldnt even feel fast, that thing would most likely suck cuz ure enclosed
__________________
I hate these Signature things..
I can never think of any thing good to say
  #15  
Old 09-15-2001, 06:02 PM
Inverted Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ohio
Age: 23
Posts: 969
I think it is a good idea to have the cars closed. Look at all the bugs MF has. Just think of that only 120 MPH. I dont think it is an eyesore either. I looks pretty cool to me.
__________________
Intelligence is a God given gift. Know how to use it.

Remember: Amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic
  #16  
Old 09-15-2001, 06:42 PM
SFGadvKing's Avatar
Better Than Any Roller Coaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: West Orange, NJ
Age: 22
Posts: 5,618
does anyone know what that blue piece of track is?
__________________
I was once TN's top poster!
2007 Gadv Count: Kingda Ka-6, El Toro-6, Nitro-4, Medusa-2, S:UF-2, R:TC-1, B:TC-, GASM-0, Skull Mt-0, B:TR-0, RMT-0, RT-0
  #17  
Old 09-15-2001, 08:06 PM
Goliathlete's Avatar
Corkscrew Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Aptos, CA
Age: 22
Posts: 441
That sucks so bad that they disapproved it! My Grandma lives outside Vegas, and I could've ridden it a lot.
__________________
Put your hands up!
  #18  
Old 09-15-2001, 09:16 PM
TopGun77's Avatar
Yojimbo
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ontario
Age: 23
Posts: 2,387
Think about it, wouldnt it be dangerous to not be enclosed going 120 MPH? I dont care if your encolsed, 740 feet is some serious nasty *&$%!!! I would ride that holy crap.
__________________
Winter is coming.
  #19  
Old 09-15-2001, 10:06 PM
intamin101's Avatar
Mullet!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Wisconsin Posts:347284
Age: 23
Posts: 3,253
Maybe, if the track wasn't that ugly yellow, it wouldn't look so bad, I mean, I love the colors of V2, but not on something that big.
  #20  
Old 09-16-2001, 06:35 AM
DrachenFire96's Avatar
Victory Not Vengeance
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pittsburgh
Age: 34
Posts: 2,478
I remember when that was supposedly a coaster, now its nothing more than a glorified freefall ride, and now its just another lost idea, assuming things don't change for the better. I have to admit, its the wierdest freefall I have ever seen and I'd probably not ride it on account of my acrophobia...Pitfall at Kennywood was enough to do me in, I didn't like the idea that I could cover Thunderbolt up with my hand, thus I greyed out. (strange that I love coasters of any height...at the moment Nitro being my tallest, and I loved it, and that darn Turbo Force, I can't get over that thing, I love that flat ride).

I can also see how it could be considered an eye sore on the city too, and I guess that is what they are contemplating.
__________________
Ich lebe deinen Traum!
  #21  
Old 09-16-2001, 11:14 AM
Giga Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Age: 23
Posts: 1,838
I don't think it would have been a good idea for the following reasons:

1. Low capacity
2. High Loading time
3. Long lines

It does look like an amazing ride, but would you wait in that huge line for a glorified freefall, as Drachenfire96 put it?
__________________
"Well, I hate to be a snitch, but my neighbor Homer Simpson turned a radioactive ape loose in my house. Its taken over the whole top floor."~Ned Flanders
  #22  
Old 09-16-2001, 11:29 AM
Suspended Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Maplewood, NJ
Age: 26
Posts: 600
It would be an awesome ride but it looks soooo ugly against the Stratosphere.
  #23  
Old 09-16-2001, 03:29 PM
Hyper Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escondido, CA
Age: 21
Posts: 1,262
i dont think there would be a huge line i mean look at the big shot it never has a line even though you could see this more so the line might be a little longer
  #24  
Old 09-16-2001, 03:45 PM
Giga Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lima, Ohio
Age: 24
Posts: 1,817
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by SFGadvKing [/i]
[B]does anyone know what that blue piece of track is? [/B][/QUOTE]

That blue "track" is actualy supports for the ride when it crosses the streat. As for how it loads, its a lot like Intinman's 1st generation free fall rides. You load at ground level and are taken up like an elevator (not laying on your back, but siting strait up) and at the top, you will make a turn and go down the drop. once you go up the 400 ft tower you go on to the breaks at the botom and the track seperates and you are moved into the loading sation.
  #25  
Old 09-16-2001, 11:58 PM
Lightning_Racer's Avatar
Jr. Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Vernon,IN
Age: 21
Posts: 4
[COLOR=darkblue]Well I think they could improve the carts by replacing the glass or whatever it would be with steel mesh with tiny hole so you could still feel the wind and a diiferent color its not the worlds largest banana is it???[/COLOR] :cool: :D :cool: :D
__________________
Tomb Raider: The Ride in 2002!!!
  #26  
Old 09-17-2001, 12:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 38
Posts: 1,434
Wow, that really makes the tower look delapitated. I think that the pic and train is awesome but that ride looks like one huge mess.
  #27  
Old 09-17-2001, 05:22 AM
Wooden Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 161
Just wondering, is the drop going to be like a 1st generation freefall and a supreme scream or a face first oblivion type of drop?
__________________
yvan eht nioj, yvan eht nioj, yvan eht nioj!
  #28  
Old 09-17-2001, 09:09 PM
Corkscrew Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Age: 24
Posts: 435
It looked like a good ride and its too bad that they won't allow it. I just wonder how they could get it to go backwards up a 750 ft. That is a really long way to drop...I wonder how it would feel? Oh well, its back to the drawing board.
  #29  
Old 09-18-2001, 05:16 PM
Giga Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lima, Ohio
Age: 24
Posts: 1,817
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Coasterlover28 [/i]
[B]. I just wonder how they could get it to go backwards up a 750 ft. [/B][/QUOTE]

A "elevator type pice of track would raise the train up like an elevator on the other side of the tower. BTW the train would stay parellel to the ground
  #30  
Old 09-18-2001, 05:26 PM
IslandKG's Avatar
Wooden Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago, US!
Age: 28
Posts: 224
[color=maroon]I am just speculating here, but maybe the only feasible way to reduce the screaming noise of the passengers is to enclose the ride vehicle. We have all seen track enclosures to reduce screaming noise for nearby residential areas ([i]Ghostrider[/i], [i]California Screamin'[/i]) but enclosing the Arrow fishhook track with a similar covering would destroy the incredible view and overall experience. It is true that enclosing the vehicle with a transparent covering would reduce the intensity (the wind in your hair, etc.) but it is a better alternative compared to the [i]cancellation[/i] of the project due to noise.[/color]
__________________
History is like an amusement park. Except instead of rides, you have dates to memorize.
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.

© 2001-2010 ThrillNetwork, LLC. All rights reserved.
About Us - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Contact Us
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4 - Copyright © 2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2