| |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| ...Park?
ok this is my very first park i had put "up" for downloading... its a good park and has some great coaster... but the land is almost all flat.. There is some un-used land.. and some rides have funny or spelt wrong names... but thats what Park is all about... the name of this park is called... Park and i spent alot of time on it so i hope you all like it ![]() and dont save tracks that i have made... because i made them and you did not... well i guess if you even like one you could just "PM" me and ask if you can...theres a 99.9% chance i would say yes...
Last edited by sfne stinks; 05-14-2002 at 06:44 PM. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
COASTERS- The coasters here were okay. Although there were really a bit to many for my tastes, none were very dominating and they looked pretty good. 6.5/10 THEMEING- This park didnt really have much themeing, but its scenery did look nice. To me, everything seemed very colorful and looked pretty good. One thing you might want to try next time though is to try making some buildings and putting more detail in, but other than that it looked pretty okay. 6.5/10 LANDSCAPING- The trees looked good and most of the park was filled up well, so I'd say you did a pretty good job on landscaping. The only problem is all the flat land, but for some reason it really didnt seem to affect the look of the park. I thought it actually looked fine with all the flat land. 7/10 OVERALL LOOK- Your park had a good overall look. I liked the way it was so colorful, even looking down from a high view. 7/10 OVERALL RATING- 7/10. This was a pretty good park! The name could use some work though...... |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Review
Coasters. This park had a lot of coasters, and yet they didn't look too dominating, nor did the park look crowded with them. There was a nice assortment of them, and they had good theming and color schemes. I like how some of the coasters like Thunder Road and Ratchot had a midway look to them, while others were more heavily themed and had that theme park look to them. Overall coaster rating: 8.1 Scenery. The scenery in this park was very nice. There was good usage of trees and flower beds in this park as well. Each of the little specialized scenery areas looked good too. I also liked the station platform of Face Off and the checkerboard terrain near Flying Super Saturater with the multi colored sculptures on them. Overall scenery rating: 7.8 Other rides. Like the coasters, there was a good assortment of other rides. They had pretty good theming as well. The log flume was probably my favorite of the other rides. It was interesting that there was more then one of some types of rides. Overall other rides rating: 8.0 Missellaneous Comments. I liked how this park combined some midway/carnival style parts, and some theme park-like parts. Good use of scenery, and it was nice how the rides were worked into the overall design of the park, rather then standing out. Overall park rating: 8.0
__________________ Aaron Cedoras: Thrillnetwork Story Editor "Dead men tell no tales..." |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Rebel2000's Review of ...Park? by sfne stinks First Glance My first impression of the park was not too good but not very bad at all. There seems to be A LOT of coasters, and some of their colors didn't really fit with their surroundings. The land is also completely flat. The good thing is that there is no blank land. 6/10 Entrance/Stations The entrance was colorful like the rest of the park. It wasn't too flashy, though. You used one of the custom stations for the rest of the park, which was ok. 6/10 Coasters Vortex <->: Basically the same as the real thing at PKI. Not much to say for originality, but a good rec. 7/10 Ratchot: Average Wild Mouse. Not much to say except where are the sharp drops after the sharp turns? 5/10 DrAgOn CoAsTeR!: Deja Vu? Right? Good use of the onride camera and Far East theming. 7/10 Huler!: Another rec. By far the best I've seen of that ride. 8/10 Tumb Radier The Ride!: Very cool and original! Great theming! 9/10 Virgina Reel: Very good for a Reel. I think that the colors are a little too vibrant for a nostalgic ride, however. 8/10 Serpent: Pretty cool. Got better and faster all the way to the end. 7/10 Andacanda: A little too unimaginative for being such a powerful. Fits well into its narrow space, though. 8/10 Avlanch: Nice bobsled. I like how the queue goes under it and the theming. 7/10 Greased Lighting: I like the wavy twister theme thingy. Shuttle loops are launched, not dropped, though. 7/10 Top Cat's Taxi Jam: Kiddie coaster. Not much to say. 6/10 Silver Streak: Very nice, orignal. Great setting. 8/10 Beasty: Hmm, I thought there was more to Beastie than that. Not bad. 6/10 King Kobra: Good rec. Does justice to a now dormant coaster. 7/10 Stealth: Very nice! Great inversions! Nice flying! Nice speed! 9/10 Kiddy Coaster: Wierd being Schwarzkopf and wierd with two cars. Good, despite that. 7/10 Flying Super Saturater: Pretty cool. I like the path to the first splash. 8/10 Sky Liner: Starts off very Schwarzkopfy, but then goes for a bumpy ride. 6/10 Thunder Road: Not much to say. I like the how the colors are different on the top and bottom. 6/10 Top Gun--Jet Coaster: Very cool. I love the first drop and ending. 8/10 Wizzer: I really liked the theming for this one. 7/10 Racer (F)/Racer (B): Good, very John Allenish. 8/10 XLC-2K2: Short but sweet air launcher. The colors are little too vibrant for me, though. 8/10 Face Off: The tall trees near it added a cool effect. Again with the colors! 7/10 Flight Of Fear!: A very good ride in a very unexpected place. 9/10 7/10 Theming There should have been WAY more building, if any. In the places where you did theme, it looked very nice. I kinda wish that there was more! 6/10 Landscaping By far one of the BEST landscaping jobs I've ever seen. The scenery was what really made each area. The gardens and forests were all great! Great combinations! 9/10 Other Rides Wow. A LOT of other rides. Practically all of them. For flat rides, they had great theming. Nice colors, also. I kinda wish that you had named them, though. 8/10 Names This was a big problem. The two main problems with rides' names were either they were mispelled or were just the type of that ride. Just brainstorming the names is fun, and it'd be a lot better. 6/10 Layout The park had a very confusing layout. It was really just a bunch of blocks. Actually, I kinda like that method, despite the confusion. I guess its ok. 7/10 Originality At first it didn't seem like this park was very original, but it did after awhile. I guess its the fact that despite there were so many coasters, the landscaping was so good. 8/10 Realness/Spectacularness I'll definitely go with Spectacularness, since its obvious that no real park would have 24 coasters. I don't think that any real park would have so much diverse landscaping, too. Great! 8/10 71/100 VERY GOOD!!!
__________________ SFA SOURCE . . . Last edited by Rebel2000; 05-16-2002 at 11:39 PM. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
wow people liked it ?!?... well i have like 2 more parks that i will post.. but most of the bad things in this park are the same because i made them all at the same time.. Funland is like this..butn Japan Fun Place will be a bit better.. i hope |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
That was a pretty good park. It had a lot of Roller Coasters without making it look over crowded. The only thing I didn't like was the name. I'll give it a 6.8/10
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| © 2001-2009 ThrillNetwork, LLC. All rights reserved. About Us - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Contact Us |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4 - Copyright © 2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 |