|
|
|
Advertisement |
|
|
Editorials: CSI takes on Rollercoaster-esque plot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted at 1:22 PM EDT (1722 GMT) Apr. 18th, 2004 --
On May 6th, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation has a big episode planned to try and lure viewers away from NBC (this is the same night as the Friends series finale) and to CBS. This sort of tactic is common in television, of course, but the topic of this episode is not. Entitled “Turn of the screws,” this one is set at the fictional Las Vegas Sphinx Amusement Park and centers around a roller coaster crash.
"This season in general we've been focusing on small storylines, but this is a big story," said writer and producer Josh Berman. "It'll have the highest body count ever." CSI in general focuses on smaller, accurately researched stories, which have garnered it a lot of acclaim. However, this story seems not only far-fetched but also possibly damaging to the amusement industry as a whole. The episode was finally filmed at Pharaoh’s Lost Kingdom in Redlands after being turned down by numerous larger parks who didn’t want a coaster accident—even a staged one—associated with their name. It’s little wonder why.
Director Deran Sarafian was paraphrased in the Redlands Daily Facts as saying “when investigators get to the scene, they find more bodies than seats on the roller coaster, and eventually surmise that one was already dead in the trunk of a parked car hit by the falling coaster.”
This sort of quote is particularly disturbing. Although the bodies are fictional as is the entire plot, there are viewers who will see the catastrophe as just as likely to happen as any other murder and consequent investigation that is shown on the show. Anybody that has worked for a park or around the industry for a while can tell you that it simply isn’t so.
“Turn of the screws” refers to someone—the articles I found do not mention whether it is a park employee or outside general public member—sabotaging a rollercoaster to either cover up the murder of the body in the trunk or to kill more park goers (the spoilers I read did not make this clear). In the episode, the coaster actually derails and goes crashing to the parking lot below, squishing a car.
Even in the early days of coasters before up-stop wheels, crashes of this magnitude were rare. Today they are virtually unheard of. Coasters derail, and yes, in the case of Disney’s Big Thunder Mountain Railroad (which the producers and directors of CSI insist this episode was not influenced by) sometimes guests die, but the sort of body count implied by the episodes’ writers has literally not occurred in over 80 years (and that was the result of a fire, not a derailment). I would sooner see some real research turning out an episode based upon a carnival (where deaths are more likely if not more prevalent) or sabotage causing the death of one or two passengers. But an entire train? The only time I’ve borne witness to such a travesty was on Rollercoaster Tycoon, and that game has been criticized in the past for unrealistic crashes.
My real fear is that viewers in the general populace that are heavily influenced by television and the news will take the episode to heart and be afraid to take their children to parks this summer. There are far worse things to fear that rollercoaster sabotage, but a particularly vivid example on television might keep some kids from the parks. I don’t expect this to hurt the industry as a whole, but I know my own mother will probably be warning me about it come May 8 when I go to opening day at Cedar Point, and I’m 23.
Lastly, it is possible that CSI will come through and this episode will be brilliantly handled in the way I’ve come to expect from them in the past. There is a quoted line in the Redlands article from the fictional Woody, played by Ron Dean, told Grissom, as he leaned over the snack shack, "I just hope they don't blame the coaster. It may not be the Manhattan Express at New York, New York or the Desperado in Primm, but it still makes grown men scream."
If this episode proves to be well written it can be used to show that coasters are not always the problem when accidents occur. Park security and maintenance (which should keep such accidents from happening) may be shown as being particularly tight as to make such an accident unlikely if not entirely unthinkable. However, it’s just as likely that the security at the imaginary park will be lax, or that maintenance will miss something that real park maintenance should never miss, and that the sabotage will slip through the cracks of a faulty system and lead to the deaths.
Regardless, I suppose I’ll be watching on May 6 with my fingers crossed that “Turn of the screws” will not only be a “big” episode designs to lure viewers during sweeps, but will also be an accurate one that the industry needn’t be afraid of.
For more information see the Redlands Daily Facts and a site for show fans, CSI Files.
|
More about Editorials
News by Jill Anne
 Database Links

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comments |
edh101985
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4293
View Park/Ride Count
|
Well I defenately will be trying to watch that episode. Its one of my favorite shows. I just hope I will be able to watch everything at once since all of my favorite shows air on that day. And I think its not that big of a deal. Everyone knows that CSI is a fictional show, so I dont see why anyone will think of coasters any different.
BTW, I've notices that on all the CSI shows, they always arrest someone. I think that it will most likely not be blamed on the ride, but on an actual person. The show IS based on murder investigations, so that makes me believe also it will be a actual person's fault.
|
| 4/18/2004 2:13 PM |
|
darque
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 715
View Park/Ride Count
|
I think you're looking into it a little to much. It's just a TV show. If it was an expose by 60 Minutes detailing handful of infractions at various parks, you'd have a point. But a fictional television show???
There are countless examples of other industries that get the Hollywood treatment. The typical reaction, that is to say, what we're taught to believe, is that society will come crashing down, and hate....whatever it is TV (or film) is portraying. Everything from Planes, Trains and Automobiles have survived TV's [i]fictional[/i] treatment, rest assured, so will our precious Roller Coasters.
I too will be hoping for an exciting episode.
Oh yeah, believe me when I say this. Mother's will always worry. You'll be 60 years old and she'll still caution her little baby.
|
| 4/18/2004 2:40 PM |
|
adderrick
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 37
View Park/Ride Count
|
For the person new to riding coasters they may get a little antsy about riding another one. But for us veteran coaster riders, that episode isnt going to deter me from riding more. On the other side with CSI trying to make their episodes as accurate as possible, i do think this episode is a little too far fetched. Such an accident like that is little to almost impossible to happen. Not only that but if they wanted it to be realistic, they should of centered it around a Merry Go Round which is STILL the most dangerous ride in an amusement park. I dont watch CSI, but this time I will be watching it laughing at how unrealistic it really is.
|
| 4/18/2004 4:19 PM |
|
Jill Anne
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 568
View Park/Ride Count
|
The point is *not* that they are making an episode that makes coasters look bad, but that they aren't being as realistic as I've come to expect from the show. If you've seen CSI you *know* that they're generally pretty honest about what is possible and likely and what isn't. So why is this one any different?
|
| 4/18/2004 4:38 PM |
|
Chip
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7137
View Park/Ride Count
|
I never watch the show, but I'll have to try to catch this one. I really just hope it doesn't portray the amusement industry in a bad light.
I wonder how they could make the entire train derail? They try to make the show as realistic as they can, so they would have people research things. How could they fail to research upstop wheels? Coasters don't just derail.
I guess I'll just have to watch this episode to get the whole story.
|
| 4/18/2004 5:03 PM |
|
iluvcoasters
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 323
View Park/Ride Count
|
I'll be very interested in watching this episode.
|
| 4/18/2004 5:51 PM |
|
kermat13
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 425
View Park/Ride Count
|
Hmmm--might mean less lines at the park.
|
| 4/18/2004 7:38 PM |
|
PANTSFREE
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1337
View Park/Ride Count
|
Yeah, anybody remember the movie Rollercoaster from the 70's? This sounds like worst rip off of that movie ever. The first "murder" of the film is done when a maintenance worker uses a boom to blow up part of the track and cuz the train to derail and kill everyone. It's mad crazy...
In n e case, some ppl r morons so they'll take this show seriously and avoid coasters for ever.
|
| 4/18/2004 9:40 PM |
|
Richard Wilson
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1648
View Park/Ride Count
|
I'm confused at the notion that this plot is alleged to be not as realistic as CSI normally is.
Okay, there's a crazed lunatic out there who works as a mechanic at the park. He decides he wants to derail the ride and kill people so he loosens all the bolts holding the guide and upstop wheels. Simple as that. That might not be it, but the point is that a realistic situation could be created to allow a coaster to derail. The show is about badies who kill people. It's not about investigating accidents that have happened because of metal fatigue or an accidently loose bolt. Where there's evil there's room for almost anything.
It hasn't happened before, outside of the 1977 George Segal film, but that doesn't stop the show in many cases. They take POSSIBLE (however unprobable) situations and turn them into BELIEVABLE or REALISIC stories. That's why CSI has done as well as it has.
Hey, you'd think with all the dead bodies they pull out of Vegas people wouldn't be flocking there in the millions that they do. A few screwballs who believe everything they see on TV to the extent where they don't allow their kids to visit Six Flags during the summer aren't enough to impact the industry.
|
| 4/19/2004 6:24 AM |
|
coasterphil
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9182
View Park/Ride Count
|
I don't really see the big deal either. Its just CSI doing their thing.
|
| 4/19/2004 5:51 PM |
|
CoasterJunkie
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 341
View Park/Ride Count
|
If they used the Screaming Mummy coaster there, then I can say that I rode it multiple times and lived. Then I'll go on TV and tell everyone it's safe, because if they believe a fictional show on TV, then they HAVE to believe a real person on TV.
|
| 4/20/2004 10:51 PM |
|
edh101985
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4293
View Park/Ride Count
|
^Um, thats stupid. Like you can just "go on TV and tell everyone it's safe." Besides, the studio is in California.
CSI will most likely focus more on the murderer then the coaster accident.
|
| 4/21/2004 7:13 AM |
|
Jerry Huster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 345
View Park/Ride Count
|
I think this show is a great idea! Sure, it may look bad...but I absolutely LOVE CSI and roller coasters...so, what could be better? May sweeps has always been about "how can we shock, surprise, please, appease the masses." It's funny though how CBS-co-owned Paramount Parks weren't involved. Both CBS and PP are owned by Viacom...so you'd think this would be a perfect display of "synergy". You could also say that even Viacom realizes just how damaging this story-line could be. I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but rollercoasters have and always will be the safest ride in any amusement park. (and I'll be watching that episode in HD! yay!)
|
| 4/21/2004 7:22 AM |
|
leeloo1953
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3279
View Park/Ride Count
|
I don't think this show is going to do anything to ruin the idea of coasters being fun. People are not going to stop riding coasters because of this show. Oh, you might have the over-protective parent or the kid who thinks it's really true, but that's about it.
There's really nothing to worry about as far as this episode is concerened.
Now movies are different than tv...I haven't put even put a toe in any ocean since I saw Jaws at the theater!!! LOL
|
| 4/26/2004 5:18 PM |
|
Magnum Robert
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3196
View Park/Ride Count
|
^ I agree, leeloo.
I'm not a big fan of this show, but if I remember, I will watch this episode.
|
| 4/30/2004 3:18 AM |
|
Jerry Huster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 345
View Park/Ride Count
|
I just saw the preview for this episode at the end of last night's and I have to say...the effects are pretty decent. However, this appears to be no more than a carnival coaster...and an accident seems a whole lot more likely on a carny coaster than a permanent installation.
|
| 4/30/2004 9:49 PM |
|
fbama73
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2163
View Park/Ride Count
|
First of all, I LOVE CSI- it's one of the best shows on TV. That said, I disagree that their connection to accuracy is as strong as some people have stated.
Often times, I (as a semi-stupid layman) have noticed the CSI's jumping to conclusions that a trained investigator never would. But the funniest part is whenh they reach in the bag, and pull out the bottle of Luminol, and start spraying away. Luminol is a carcinogen, real Investigators use a biosuit and SCBA when using the stuff.
I'll be lookin g forward to this episode, and will probably enjoy it. I think those who fear it will hurt the industry are maybe overreacting a bit.
Does anyone remember how bad the movie "Rollercoaster" hurt the coaster business? It didn't. The movie came out early in what many call a "golden age" of coasters. It didn't slow things down one bit, and neither will this.
The poor guy coming off of S:ROS might, though. I know if I was a maintenance director at a park that had an Intamin, I'd be looking into this one intensely. (Are you listening, Monty Jasper? I've got a date with Millie in August, and I'd like this handled, please!)
|
| 5/3/2004 3:16 AM |
|
edh101985
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4293
View Park/Ride Count
|
Oh darn...the movie is at the same time slot as the Friends final episode. I probably will be watching the last episode of Friends mainly, and watching CSI on commercials...
|
| 5/3/2004 1:55 PM |
|
|
|